Thursday, December 22, 2011

Who violated the rule of law?

Please allow me to remind you first: that our people brought a new government to power because our people felt an urgent need for change. That change was nothing more and nothing less than that of moving quickly into a new moral order.

- Oscar P. Lagman

“The people believed that when we said we would be the exact opposite of Marcos, we would be just that. Because of that promise, our triumph over Marcos was anchored on a principle of morality. It was not rice, roads, bridges, water, electricity and such other mundane things that people expected of us. It was, and is much more. A moral order led by you, Cory.”

That was what Chino Roces said when he felt Cory was falling short of the people’s expectations. Ironically, the occasion was Chino’s conferment of the Legion of Honor, degree of Chief of Commander, by the president herself. But no one among Cory’s political allies and media friends said that given the occasion, Chino’s response was inappropriate, that he was disrespectful. Cory and her allies humbly acknowledged Chino’s reminder.

Noynoy Aquino anchored his presidential bid on the promise that if elected he would send Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and all her accomplices in the plunder of the nation’s treasury to jail. I believed him as did 15 million voters. Thus, he triumphed overwhelmingly over GMA’s candidate, whoever he was.

At the National Justice Criminal Summit, President Noynoy Aquino said that Chief Justice Renato Corona has been an obstruction to his (PNoy’s)pursuit of his campaign promise. GMA’s toadies in Congress and sycophants in media cried “foul” over the president’s lament. They said it was the wrong occasion because the remarks were made in the presence of Corona, a convenor of the summit, in effect co-host of the affair, and because the event was for the purpose of calling for cooperation and coordination among agencies of the justice system, not for citing who is remiss.

That only revealed the true character of GMA’s minions in Congress and in media. As if cued by a green light or a buzzer, they howl in protest the instant any of her protectors is taken to task. Precisely because of the purpose of the summit, PNoy’s call for Corona to cooperate in the pursuit of justice instead of being an obstruction was most appropriate for the occasion.

Anyway, I wanted very much to hear the response of Corona to the issues raised against him by President Aquino, in particular the issue of Corona’s illegal appointment as chief justice. The Constitution says that two months immediately before the next presidential elections, and up to the end of his term, the President shall not make appointments, except temporary appointments to executive positions when continued vacancies thereon will prejudice public service or endanger public safety. Corona was appointed chief justice two days after the elections and before the end of GMA’s term, in contravention of the cited provision of the Constitution.

While Corona told his reporters he would let the president’s remarks be because it is almost Christmas, I thought it was more prudence than goodwill that dictated him to hold his peace. I was certain he would have difficulty justifying his appointment as chief justice. His apologists, notably his squire Midas Marquez (he was jumping and running during the rally for Corona), could only say Corona did not appoint himself chief justice, implicitly absolving him of violation of the Constitution. But by accepting the position, Corona became party to the transgression of the Constitution. The silence of the associations of judges, the union of civil libertarians, and that school of men and women for others who all now invoke the rule of law was deafening.

When the House of Representatives impeached Corona more or less of the same wrongdoings that PNoy leveled against him, he was forced to respond in public. Speaking before his summoned associates in the Supreme Court, RTC judges, clerks of courts, and other personnel of the judiciary, he said he was going to answer the charges point by point.

I waited with bated breath for his answers to the issues of his illegal appointment as chief justice, the issuance of a status quo ante order against the House of Representatives in the case concerning the impeachment of Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez, and failure to disclose to the public his statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth.

I cite above the provision in the Constitution that pertains to midnight appointments. The Constitution also says that the House of Representatives shall have the exclusive power to initiate all cases of impeachment and that members of the Supreme Court shall disclose their assets, liabilities, and net worth to the public.

Corona did not answer the complaints point by point as he said he would. On his appointment as chief justice, he said the appointment went through the process in that he was nominated by the Judicial and Bar Council then chaired by Chief Justice Reynato Puno. Nowhere in the Constitution is nomination by the JBC said to be an exception to the provision on midnight appointments.

About his SALN, he simply said he has declared that every year. His squire Midas very recently admitted that Corona’s decision not to disclose his SALN was pursuant to the resolution approved by the tribunal then headed by Andres Narvasa. He arrogantly told the President and his allies to appeal the tribunal’s resolution instead of taunting Corona. But the Constitution specifically says the SALN disclosure should be made to the public.

Again, the silence of the associations of judges, the union of civil libertarians, and that school of men and women for others who all now invoke the rule of law was deafening on these transgressions of the Constitution.

The association of judges in their declaration asserted that decisions of the Supreme Court are under our civil law part of the law of our land and are binding as precedents. So, in effect, the Corona Court is enacting new laws that are contrary to the provisions of the basic law of the land -- the Constitution.

But as constitutionalist Joaquin Bernas pointed out in his column “Sovereignty of the People,” our Constitution begins with the assertion that “The Philippines is a democratic and republican state. Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.” He added that the sovereign people assert their sovereignty in two distinct processes, the first through the vote in a plebiscite ratifying the Constitution, that through this process the people express in a permanent manner what the power of government should be, what the limitations are, how the people who are to exercise the powers of sovereignty are to be chosen and what the extent and limits of their power are.

The Corona Court has therefore usurped the authority of the sovereign people of the Philippines by revising provisions of the Constitution. I am glad I am not a member of the Bar, otherwise with that last statement I would soon be feeling the wrath of the Corona Court. Or would I still feel judicial muscle hustling me?

The Men and Women for Others stated that the independence of the Judiciary is the very foundation of the Rule of Law. Destroy it and our People will have nowhere to seek redress and justice. But it is precisely the lack of independence of the Corona Court that is at issue. The Corona Court has destroyed itself by being subservient to the wishes of its patron -- GMA. With Corona heading the court, the people have not been able to bring GMA to justice.

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines stated that it is constitutional duty of the President as head of state to strengthen the institutions of the justice system which includes the Supreme Court. That was the message of PNoy at the National Justice Criminal Summit -- remove Corona from the Supreme Court to strengthen it.

The judges associations ask that their juridical actions be given the respect and regard the Constitution entitles them to. Respect and regard are not bestowed by the Constitution. They are earned from the people. In fact, the judges lost the respect of the people long ago. They have had the reputation of being the best judges money can buy. Their abandoning their post last week, on the mere directive of Corona’s squire Midas, to listen to Corona whimper only revealed the weakness of their character.


- Oscar P. Lagman

http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=9&title=Who-violated-the-rule-of-law?&id=43552

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Inappropriate Language in Radio Broadcast: Basis for a Proposed Policy for Adherence to Ethical Standards in Philippine Radio

Undergraduate Research of
Barruga, Marjorie B.
Rinchon, Peter John M.
Soriano, Donna Joana A.

Mainly, this research aims to first, identify what are commonly used inappropriate language during radio broadcast and second what are the present policies governing such act. With this main two reasons we derived our main problem, which is why do media practitioners tend to use inappropriate language during radio broadcast despite the fact that there are present policies governing such act.

Based on your opinion, is the used of inappropriate language in radio broadcast ethical or unethical? what is more important creativity in delivering the news? or responsibility as media practitioner in delivering news?
Guys, ice breaker lang. :)

Punta kayo Google then type "Let it Snow." Tapos more more antay lang kayo, then pwede na kayong magsulat :D
Watch this!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1b58E3IffI

ETHICAL OR UNETHICAL?


FROM (trainees from DZRH):
Francisco, Genalli Grace
Rinchon, Peter John
Silva, Cristine Hazel
Soriano, Donna Joana

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Further Ramblings on The Good, The Bad and the Ugly



Ignorance is bliss, especially when you have enough recreational time to help you escape the mundane novelties of everyday life; but being a mass communication student forced me to think otherwise. We have to be cognizant.


We have to be in the “circle”/in the know. Aspirants that we are to be a part of mass media, we should know the sphere of influence it has. The impact it can have to an audience, as well as its light and dark side.


The Over Arching role mass media plays in history, can be divided in two general roles. The Constructive character it plays out, which has given rays of sunshine, hope and unity to the nation and the Destructive Character it positions itself in, which has mislead the public, covered for criminals and flat out steered the country to a leadership that fulfils a checklist for vested interests.


One thing that never fails to amaze me about myself, is the sheer lack of enthusiasm I have for politics, economics or anything that’s current state of affairs. I may have a love for general information: anything and everything under the sun, but simply put; news of things relating to such puts a bad taste in my mouth. In my eyes it’s like a rehashed script pegged for usage for the next day, the day after and whenever mass media is still relevant to society.


The mass media is a religion in its own right. Like religion, mass media can become a tool to control the masses. It can help people get closer, or break out in bloody war. In the local scene, Mass media has been riding along our nation’s history. Seemingly like a close advisor, that has guided our dear country’s inhabitants to play capture the flag for specific teams.

The Philippine Democracy has not been realized. What we have is a sugar coated shadow of a previously promising nation. The Edsa revolution is clever marketing. The past presidential elections was a Beauty Pageant full of aspirants good and bad, but one was favoured above all by one of the major family oriented Philippine networks.


In a literal sense, the Democracy we have has been spurned by specifically molded information sent across the nation.

The right thing we are supposed to do has been advertised so well, that sometimes the lines of right and wrong are blurred. Change invites change, I start with the change I did for myself: Less ignorance and more of having a grasp of the situation. With this I hope to make an informed decision, which hopefully contributes in derailing the country’s path to a downward spiral. I cannot make the change alone.

Friday, December 16, 2011

Media ethics can only exist in democracy

Sisimulan ko ang papel na ito sa pagbibigay depinisyon sa salitang etika. Ang etika ay ang moral na paniniwala sa konsepto ng tama o mali. Kung i-uugnay ito sa konsepto ng demokrasya, masasabi kong ito ay magkabuhol. Sinasalamin ng etikang pang-midya ang namamayaning uri ng estadong mayroon ang isang bansa. Kung ito ay pinaghaharian ng isang awtoritariyan o diktatoryal na pamamalakad, marahil ay imposibleng mabuhay ang ideya ng midya etiks sa kadahilanang ang midya, ay kinokontrol, sinasakal, at nililimitahan ng awtoridad. Sa madaling salita, walang malayang pamamahayag. Ang lahat ay idinidikta alinsunod sa mga naisin ng may kapangyarihan. Kung gayon, para saan pa ang midya etiks?

Ngunit paminsan, depende rin ito sa kung paano natin tinitingnan ang etika. Naniniwala akong abusado ang midya sa karapatan nitong alamin ang katotohanan. Subalit, kung hindi ito abusado, hindi natin malalaman ang maliliit na detalyeng nagaganap sa gobyerno, sa bayan, sa lipunan, at sa mundo. Kung ang usapin naman ay ukol sa kaugnayan nito sa demokrasya, siguro dapat nating isipin kung ano ang batayan nito. Ito ba ay ang malayang pagsisiwalat ng impormasyon? Ng katotohanan? Maging tama man ito o mali? Nakakatapak man ito sa iba o hindi? Sa panahong inuulan ng mga walang muwang na mamamayan ang isang bansa, naniniwala akong ang impormasyon ang nagmimistulang saligang-batas ng mga mamamayan; sandata laban sa pagmamanipula ng makapangyarihan.

Sa aking palagay, kinakailangang liyaban ng demokrasya ang apoy ng jornalismo upang ito ay makapagsimula. Ito ang pinakaunang prinsipyo ng etikang pang-midya. Dapat magkaroon ng manipestasyon ng demokrasya sa sarili nitong “self-conduct” upang ito ang maging epektibo sa pagbubukas ng sarili sa publiko. Ang kalayaan sa pamamahayag at impormasyon ay mahalaga sa anumang umiiral na demokrasya. Ang partisipasyon ng publiko sa paggawa ng mga desisyon ay nangangahulugan sila’y dapat siksik sa kaalaman at malayang palitan ng kanilang mga opinyon. 

Minsan, naisasaalang-alang ang demokrasya sa tuwing may masasagasaang nasa kapangyarihan. Ito ang dahilan kung bakit maraming media practitioner at journalist ang nakukulong o ‘di naman kaya ay, ipinapapatay. Kaya mahalaga ang midya etiks sa isang demokratikong bansa dahil nagsisilbi itong gabay sa tamang proseso ng responsableng jornalismo. Pumapasok na rito ang ideya ng self-regulation bilang tugon sa social responsibility ng bawat bahagi ng industriyang ito. Sa tingin ko, kailangang subukan ng midyang palawakin ang konsepto ng demokrasya. 

Base sa aking mga nasaksihan, hindi nagtagumpay ang tradisyunal na midya sa pagpapakilala, pagpapanatili, at pagpapakalat ng demokrasya sa ating bansa. Sinasalamin lamang nito ang mga nakahain nang ideyolohiya’t kaugalian ng isang lipunan. Mabuti na lamang at umuusbong ang makabagong midya kung saan nakikita ng publiko ang posibilidad ng mas malawak na patunay ng demokrasya at pagputol sa pagwawalang-bahala ng marami sa atin. Sa panahon ngayon, mas tumitindi ang tungkulin ng midya etiks sa pagiging gabay nito hindi lamang sa mga tao sa industriya kundi maging ng mga simpleng mamamayang nais tumugon sa mga isyu ng lipunan.  


from: http://angdiaperninanay.blogspot.com/2011/11/media-ethics-can-only-exist-in.html

Ethics Undefined

Ethics is such a hard word to comprehend. I mean, sure, there are various definitions to it but every person has their own set of ethics and with these don't we have our own definition within ourselves because all of us were brought up differently, have different experiences,religions,principles, goals and dreams? If that's the case for you readers, does this mean we also have a different set of media ethics when we go and find ourselves in the shoes of a media practitioner? If so, how do we remedy this? If we can't are we being unethical or are we just doing our job? Is the law the only thing defining our ethics if we are all different?

Ernest Hemingway quote

Here's a quote from Ernest Hemingway:


Make sense? :)
A Journalist should know how to be First, Right but be right first.
This article by Michael Grimes may help us in answering the question, Has social media clouded journalists’ integrity?
enjoy reading

WHO ARE YOU?

Class,  PLEASE use your whole name in the class blog. 
This is stated in the Blog Guidelines

Posts will not be considered if you don't rename your usernames. 

Goodluck on your exams and Happy Holidays!

Thank you


Thursday, December 15, 2011

Aquino, an ‘emerging dictator’?

DO you agree with what President Aquino's decision to Chief Justice Renato Corona?

With President Benigno Aquino III on the attack against Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona, senators fear Aquino may be turning to something similar to or worse than a dictator.


In his speeches, Aquino has repeatedly slammed Corona with allegations of corruption and bias in favor of the former president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

Senators, who will sit as judges in Corona’s impeachment trial, said the war between the executive and judiciary raises serious questions in Philippine politics.

“I don’t know if you can call it dictatorship but when the judiciary is no longer considered an equal branch, then there is danger that the executive will have super authority which our system tries to avoid,” Senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr. said. “Apparently, Aquino is trying to defeat that concept.”
A super Executive branch
Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago also weighed in, saying that if the president succeeds, “he will have in effect introduced the concept of a powerful, a super Executive.”
She added, “Right now, the Supreme Court as an institution is under attack. So if President Aquino is successful, he would have been able to prevail with his theory of a powerful executive that is more powerful than the other two branches.”

When asked if this poses danger to the country, Santiago replied, “If you like conservatism, you will feel threatened by all of these developments.”

Meanwhile, Corona, who has kept his silence amid the president’s accusations, finally defended himself publicly on Wednesday. He said he would oppose Aquino’s “emerging dictatorship.”


source: http://ph.news.yahoo.com/aquino--an-%E2%80%98emerging-dictator%E2%80%99-.html

A true JOURNALIST

Aquira Lat 

After reading the article by veteran Journalist Maria Ressa, I admire her courage to put her commitment as a Journalist first before patronizing the wishes of her then immediate superiors at ABS-CBN. Despite the comments from her bosses that she was being ‘too critical’ at times, did not stop her from being accurate, complete and precise in her reporting.

Instead of giving into the pressure and demands of her peers and their judgments that ABS-CBN will not and cannot be fair in reporting when it comes to issues involving companies owned by the Lopez clan, she in turn believed that this was a “good time to an ABS-CBN journalist because times like these define a news organization and tell us much about our society”.

I like how Ms. Ressa believes that the only way to “manage the interest of the Lopezes” is to NOT manage their interest, because their interest is NOT the interest of the newsroom. By doing this, she clearly affirms that she is a journalist first and an employee second. In a country like the Philippines where the economy is not doing well and re-employment is very difficult, Ms. Ressa showed that her integrity and principle can never be bought nor dictated.

It wasn’t really important which company was being mentioned in the article, I believe a good Journalist does not even consider what ‘name’ and what ‘company’ is involved in the issue; rather we should be concerned about the Filipinos that are being affected by the decisions that we make.

As a senior Mass Communication student, I will set my goals high but my principles intact. I will do my best to not give in to the temptations of “overnight income” and shady deals. By doing so I will not only make my parents and family proud; but also, as Ms. Ressa stated, I can make my country a better one ‘with transparency.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Media , the one who molds the idea's of people.
Celebrities as Role model for kids and Media who sets what is socially acceptable for the society.

"Beauty might bring happiness, but happiness always brings beauty"

Retouching photographs, is that ethical? if so, does that mean we are influencing the masses in perceiving what is the true definition of beauty? Check this video!

Monday, December 12, 2011

“OVER USED FREEDOM”

Donna Joana Soriano 
Democracy where in the society is characterized by formal equality of rights and privileges. Often referred to as freedom. Mass media, a means of communication that reach large numbers of people in a short time. I can say the most influential way of pursuing people.
In the world of latest gadgets and newest trending technology, media has been also the latest trend in showing how freedom is expressed in our country. Under our constitution, we have this Bill of Rights, which includes the Freedom of Expressions.
Freedom of expression, something every media men is holding into. This right can make them say, do or write at least almost everything they want to.
Media has played a big part in achieving our so called freedom today; people during the 1986 People Power were witnesses of this event, since not everybody where near the vicinity of this historic moment, people from other part of the country witnessed it through news coverage over television and radio, pictures through the newspaper.
But today, the same power that the media once used, is still taking over the society. Everyone is so aware of how the media works; a lot of people in this business were doing things that are best beneficial to those people who have great power. So influential that even it can even change a perception of a person for a certain thing, take for example by simply choosing what brand of shampoo will you use, since there are a lot of advertisement on different brand names on television, there can be a tendency that people will try something that will be new for them or they will try it ‘cause the ad made them curious on trying it. Also like in choosing which candidate will you choose in an election, candidates spends how much for their candidacy just to be voted. The mass media may be manipulated by giving out information which may convey the real interest of the candidate, which at the end the people will choose that candidate.
Expressing out our opinions is one of the identities of being in media that at some point some media men are over rated in doing it to the point we are hurting other people’s feeling and dignity. Yes we may be exercising democracy but it is way over when we started to hurt other people. For me it is something that most people not only media people are forgetting about.

Class Documents and Readings are UP!



Hi Class,


You may view/download our class documents and your readings HERE 


Goodluck on your prelim exam and have a happy holidays!


~Ms. Candice

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Journalists: More Ethical than People Realize? | Poynter.

Journalists: More Ethical than People Realize?

Morality and Ethics: An Introduction By Stephen M. Perle, DC, MS

Morality and ethics are terms often used as if they have the same meaning. At other times, they are used as if they have no relationship to one another. I think most people realize ethics and morality have something to do with the concepts of good and bad.
However, English is not like French, which has the Acadàmie Fran�aises acting as its linguistic jury - establishing what is proper French. English changes at the whim of the populous. One can bomb (especially in stand-up comedy), and that's bad, but if one is the bomb (e.g., "Gee, you're swell!"), that's good. The word "morality" has been co-opted by groups, such as the Moral Majority, making us think morality only deals with acts these religious groups think aren't proper, or are therefore immoral. If you ask people to define "immoral," generally they will give an answer that has to do with sex.
The meanings of the terms "ethics" and "morality" can be differentiated based on their origins in ancient Greek and Latin, respectively. We know that the foundations of Western philosophy came from the ancient Greeks. Thus, if one were to use a single term to describe the Greeks, it would be "philosophers."
On the other hand, the ancient Romans developed many of the techniques used in architecture, so much of their work still stands. Hence, one might describe the Romans as builders. As a result, words that come into the English language from the Greeks often have meanings that are primarily philosophical study, while the Latin-derived words imply "doing the thing."
Ethics comes from the Greek word ethos - moral character or custom. Morality comes from the Latin word moralis - custom or manner. The words both deal with the customs or the manner in which people do things. Their modern meanings relate to the way people act - either good or bad.
Morality, strictly speaking, is used to refer to what we would call moral conduct or standards. Morality is looking at how good or bad our conduct is, and our standards about conduct. Ethics is used to refer to the formal study of those standards or conduct. Sometimes, one refers to the study of conduct as moral philosophy, but that is less common than just saying "ethics." Hence, in most chiropractic colleges, there is an ethics class, rather than one named "morality." One might say that morality is ethics in action, but in the end, the two terms can be used interchangeably. The study of ethics or moral philosophy can be divided into three broad areas: descriptive, normative and analytical (or metaethics).
Descriptive ethics is simply describing how people behave. For example, people might say that they think that stealing is bad, but descriptive ethics might tell us, from observing these people, that they may have "downloaded" hundreds of media (in such forms as .mp3 audio or .bmp image) files from file-sharing programs on the Internet. Descriptive ethics let us see if we "walk the walk," and if we are just rationalizing our way past our own moral beliefs.
Sometimes it takes an unbiased observer to point out to us where we are not meeting our own standards. For some, discovering the hypocrisy might just get us to change what we say is good or bad, and adopt and lessen our professed moral code to fit our actions. Hopefully, descriptive ethics can lead to some moral self-reflection and an improvement in our own behavior.
Normative ethics tries to establish norms or typical appropriate behaviors people should perform. In ethics class, I call these the "shoulda,' gotta,' needa,' hafta' do" things. One should be honest; in the language of ethics, this is called "veracity." We know that as health care providers, we should strive to help our patients; this is called beneficence. "Above all, do no harm" (or, as Hippocrates wrote: "primum non nocere") is called "nonmaleficence" in ethics (not "nonmalfeasance"). Fairness, or justice, is another norm. Gratitude and reparations are often mentioned.
Metaethics often looks at how people determine for themselves what norms to follow. I think all parents would agree with me that they have a significant impact on what their children grow up to believe are right and wrong actions. There are many other sources of people's personal ethical beliefs. Generally, we learn good behaviors from our teachers and our religions. In fact, despite all the strife due to religions, the commonality is that they teach norms. The Ten Commandments, for example, is basically a list of norms. For better, or often, for worse, our ethics are also influenced by our peers, and our culture, as seen through the media. Lastly, we have the ability to make changes though moral self-reflection.
What roles do guilt and fear play in ethics? They are the two great guardians of the "straight and narrow." Some maintain their conduct within accepted ethical norms because of the fear of getting caught. These people often do whatever they think that they can "get away with." If they know they are not being watched and are unlikely to get caught, they will violate almost any ethical norm. Of course, if they are a bit paranoid or "chicken," they will not stray, as they are not prepared to follow the criminal's dictum: "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time."
Guilt, on the other hand, is the motivator of honest people. Their decision to comply with ethical norms is not based on whether they will get caught, but because they will know that they did something they think is wrong. Sociopaths do not feel guilt because they do not believe their actions are wrong. Ultimately, those who feel guilt as children decide to be "good" because they don't want to feel guilty again. As they get older, being good becomes a habit.
Consequently, teaching ethics in chiropractic college is not about giving someone a sense of guilt, so that he or she becomes a moral person; I think it takes a real life-altering event to do that. Teaching ethics is about exposing students to the norms of chiropractic and descriptive ethics of our profession, so they can, as the final line in our chiropractic oath says, "Enjoy life and the practice of the chiropractic healing art, respected by all people at all times."
Stephen Perle, DC, MS
Bridgeport, Connecticut

THINGS TO REMEMBER :)

http://www.eyeonethics.org/journalist-code-of-ethics-in-asia/journalists-code-of-ethics-philippines/

Friday, December 9, 2011

THINK ABOUT IT

Silva, Cristine Hazel S.

THINK ABOUT IT
It’s true that mass media can manipulate on how we think and somehow react on certain and controversial issues. Journalism has an unusual capacity to serve as watchdog over those whose power and position most affect citizens. That is one of the reasons why it has a huge impact to our society.
Just as reflected in the article of Maria Ressa, if there are certain issues about their network, they just bear in mind and treat the story as if they aren’t ABS-CBN, they are journalist first.
The main purpose of journalism is to provide citizens with accurate and reliable information they need to function in a free society. Their first obligation is to deliver just and truthful news. They make sure that they do not protect any vested interest. They must be accountable for the benefit of the people. With that few principles of journalism, it evidently affirms that every journalist must have a personal sense of ethics and responsibility- a moral compass.
I believe that news is not just all about truth and integrity; it must possess an ethical standard. There are principles that will guide us to better public service. There are limitations to remind us in our boundaries and restrictions in press freedom.
Once we enter the gigantic world of media, we must already set our minds in the focal point of the work, which is to deliver fair and reliable news. There are lots of criticisms and dilemmas along the way. It’s a step by step process of getting use to it and remembering your purpose. It’s a day by day working and learning experience.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Don't imitate. Innovate.


The internet is contributing to lazy journalism. Sean McManus says journalists must remember to add value in their reporting

Often magazines and broadcasters publish circular emails forwarded to them by their readers and listeners. Apart from the risk of a copyright suit from whoever wrote the original email (and wouldn't you just love to take part in that test case?), it makes tired editorial. By the time it reaches print, many people will have received it by email. The search for fresh ideas has been replaced by many journalists with the search for easy copy.

Emailed information is difficult to verify too as ABC News, New York Times and The Guardian discovered. According to ezine Need to Know and Top Five, the Cantonese film titles they all published as fact were invented by contributors to Top Five's website. The full list of 15 was appended to a genuine Wall Street Journal article about poorly translated film titles and released on the internet by an anonymous prankster. They included 'Field of Dreams' comically translated as 'Imaginary Dead Baseball Players Live in My Cornfield' and 'George of the Jungle' named 'Big Dumb Monkey-Man Keeps Whacking Tree With Genitals'. ABC News claims that their Chinese correspondent verified the film titles as true.

Articles sometimes appear in magazines and newspapers that just reproduce the content of websites or circular emails, without tracing or crediting the creator. After the fight to defend freelancers' copyright, it is ironic that some journalists do not respect the copyright and creativity of internet authors, who often write for the love of it and publish their work for free. Magazines also often promote websites that just pirate photos and articles from print, missing the point that the internet's strength is its ability to share new ideas and not just repackage old ones.

As newspapers try to guide their readers through cyberspace, they shouldn't compromise on originality. Journalists should seek out new websites and fresh ideas and then report on them, not just republish them. Readers will often have access to the same (or better) online sources than the journalist has. Now that most information is freely available online, journalists must ensure more than ever that they add value to the information they distribute.


I got this article in this website, http://www.sean.co.uk/a/journalism/gripe.shtm

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

The Good Journalist

Guys, I don't know what to share in this site, but try to read this article. Especially to someone who really want to be a journalist. :)

ftp://ftp.pearsoned-ema.com/HPE_Samples/SampleChapters/9781405835367.pdf

“Mass Media and Democracy”

Marielle Khate Garcia
 
When a country is under a democratic law, everyone has a free will. Every people has the right to own a property, right to go to school and be educated, right to enjoy a healthy living, right to vote and right to have a fair judgment. In order for the government to accommodate all these needs, there is a department assigned for each of them, but how about the right of people to be informed about the latest and most significant news and events? Of course, this is the reason why media exists.
As a Mass Communication student, I am still in the process of familiarizing the rules and regulations in our field but I’m glad that the years spent in this course have taught us a lot.
From the time that we are freed from the dictatorship of the Marcos regime, that’s also the time when media people were released from shackles and grief. And when the late former President Corazon Aquino ousted Marcos from his throne, the Philippine journalists celebrated as they attained the freedom of the press in the 1987 Constitution.
Since we are given this press freedom privilege, great responsibilities arise. Its role as a watchdog in the society must be justified. Just because we have the power to be transparent and opinionated, it doesn’t mean that we should be rude to the government or to its officials. Naturally, we are bound by limitations.
From our lesson in our Media Management class, these limitations (libel, anti-obscenity law, invasion of privacy law, law on national security, contempt of court and copyright law) teach the journalists to be more careful on every step that they’re going to make.
But because of the power that the media have, some politicians take advantage of their weakness. We are all aware that money is very hard to earn especially nowadays, so in order to make money fast, they agree to receive money from some officials which is called “envelopmental press”.
This kind of give-and-take process is a widespread issue among the journalists. Many are saying that there’s nothing wrong with this kind of activity but the problem is that once they give in, they are no longer playing the part of an adversarial press.
Without any doubt, living in a democratic country gives us the power to choose and it is up to us on where we’ll go--- to the road less travelled or to the other side of the road. As a future media practitioner, I am now aware of my duties and responsibilities and I am challenging my self as early as now to be loyal and honest as I can be.

The facebook post of Ms. Earth USA















This picture is also circulating in facebook and a lot of Filipinos are reacting negatively about this post. You guys? What can you say?
Last Monday, Mr. Aquino lambasted Corona at the First National Criminal Justice Summit. From this, our president earned many negative criticisms.

Lots of articles were written about this issue and one of those was this one. So tell me after reading this, what do you think his real agenda is?

Noy’s ‘real agenda’

I.N.S.I.D.E . C.O.N.G.R.E.S.S
Charlie Manalo

12/06/2011

There is really no stopping Noynoy Aquino from his newly-discovered pastime: that is bashing the Judiciary.

Yesterday, Noynoy again tried to humiliate the Supreme Court (SC) when he lambasted Chief Justice Renato Corona in front of so many people during the 1st National Criminal Justice Summit at the Manila Hotel.

While he was quick to stress he was not out to smear the credibility of the high court, he openly criticized the court of last resort saying it was the SC that had been playing with its interpretation of the law to benefit a particular group of persons, particularly former President Gloria Arroyo, who, incidentally, appointed Corona as Chief Justice.

Appealing to his audience, Aquino even asked them “what was the use of creating laws if it would not be followed.”

Yesterday was not the first time Noynoy hit the high court. In fact, next to GMA, the SC has been his favorite whipping boy the last few weeks.

And Noynoy, with his open defiance of SC rulings, plus his pronouncements that he would continue to do so if the high court again issues rulings contrary to his interests (which he wrongly perceives to be the people’s interest), might be inciting mob rule against the SC.

Relying heavily on his questionable popularity rating, Noynoy is hoping his pronouncements could send subliminal messages to his yellow followers to follow suit and defy the Judiciary in the event it issues rulings averse to their interests.

And while saying he definitely knows what he is doing despite not being a lawyer, Noynoy surely knows that his pronouncements are inviting mob rule against the Judiciary which could eventually result in a constitutional crisis.

Unless of course, if his mouth moves at a faster rate than his mind, firing those words even before his mind can comprehend them.

But let’s assume Noynoy really knows what he is doing, then it would be safe to assume also that he has a hidden agenda at the back of his mind whenever and wherever he bashes the judiciary.

Noynoy knows that with his pronouncement, he is courting a constitutional crisis. Then, what for?

Two things. First, if a constitutional crisis occurs, Noynoy could then justify the declaration of a revolutionary government, enabling him to dissolve the judiciary and the legislative and create bodies and agencies which would all be subservient to him.

In so doing, Noynoy could then persecute all of his perceived enemies without worrying he could be breaking any law or violating basic human rights as provided for in the Constitution. All then he has to worry is the backlash from the international community and human rights groups.

But then, Noynoy might not be thinking about a revolutionary government which could be quite messy if he cannot enjoin the support of the broad number of people, including the military establishment.

So, Noynoy might be actually contemplating on a second agenda, which is to rally the people against Corona whom he abhors so much he had to ask another SC justice to administer his oath-taking.

By openly criticizing Corona, expressing his disgust over the way the SC handles cases against his perceived number one enemy, the Arroyos, Noynoy might be actually laying the groundwork for the Chief Justice’s removal from office. Via impeachment.

And this line of attack is what Noynoy could actually be selling. While he is busy doing the rounds, assaulting the Judiciary at every opportunity available to him, his yellow troops are spearheading mass actions vilifying Corona, hoping that this could snowball to larger protest actions against the chief Justice. Hence, this two-pronged attack on the chief Justice could be meant to send signals to his allies in Congress to prepare the impeachment process against Corona.

But then, it was rather wise for the chief Justice not to be swayed by Noynoy’s bullying tactics and engage him in a head-on collision. He hit it right in the head when he retorted, “Magpapasko na, hayaan na natin.”

Isn’t Christmas for the kids? Or for those who think and act like kids?

Cyber Bullying is Unethical posted by Glory Jane G. Raquidan

I just read an article owned by a blogger named quietlyalmost from wordpress site dated Octber 17, 2011. http://digitalliteracy2.wordpress.com/2011/10/17/cyberbullying-is-unethical/. And obviously it tells that cyber bullying is unethical. I do believe in this because in today's generation we are being hooked by high technologies. Since it continuously diverse and becomes more accessible, people  somehow use this as their tool to commit bad acts and social networking sites are the most common used in committing unethical acts such as CYBER BULLYING. 

This is what the article tells about: 
While the internet has made a huge impact on the world in many positive ways, there is definitely a dark side of the web.  The nature of the internet and the level of anonymity provided in online forums can be a good thing, especially for those who do not feel comfortable with themselves in their lives outside of the internet, but anonymity and the ease of creating alternate personalities online can cause many problems.
Take the case of Megan Meier’s suicide in 2006 as an example.  Megan was the victim of an online scam in which a fake Myspace profile was created with the intention of gaining her trust, as well as information, in order to later humiliate her.  The profile was supposedly of a 16 year old boy who had just moved to the area and contacted the girl with intentions of befriending Megan, although in reality it was a former friend of Megan’s, the friend’s mother, and an employee of the mother.  It takes a special kind of bitch to target a 13-year-old girl when you are an adult, even if the girl in question did hypothetically spread rumors about your own daughter.  It is definitely unethical for any one to bully or deceive another person on the internet in such a way, and this case was heinous because it eventually caused Megan Meier to hang herself in her closet when the boy she thought she was talking to became hostile toward her.  Megan never did find out that the boy was actually a hoax, which makes the situation even more sad.
a smiling Megan Meier, not long before her suicide
While it is one thing for kids and teenagers to engage in cyberbullying against one another, it is quite another when adults get involved and attack a child.  Not only is this type of behavior unethical, but it is immoral and just plain malicious.  The identities of the perpetrators of the events leading to Megan Meier’s death were eventually revealed on the internet and they received some harassment as a result of their actions, such as vandalism of their property.  In my opinion, they are lucky that is all that happened after committing such unethical and maliced behavior.  If I was a mother and found out my daughter committed suicide over a “prank” played on her by not only a former friend, but adults as well, I would have tracked those people down and shanked every one of them.
When you’re on the internet, keep in mind that there are real people online, and they have real feelings even though they are interacting through computers.  The internet can give you anonymity and allow you to converse with people in ways you couldn’t do in person, but that doesn’t mean you should act like an asshole.  Just because you are interacting with others through a computer, and instead of a face, you look at a screen, it doesn’t mean you should treat others with disrespect.  The saying “treat others as you would like to be treated” still applies.  Seriously, if you engage in the type of cyberbullying that has lead to so many suicides, and so many parents losing their children over people who can’t just grow up and live without being mean to others, you are a piece of shit and should take a look at how you treat others.  Live and let live; there is no need to attack other people, online or not.

I feel so bad for all the families who have lost loved ones due to cyberbullying, and I often wish there was more that could be done for the victims.  We are put on this world to support one another and help each other, not to tear others down and make people feel bad about themselves.  While I truly believe the world should live in peace and harmony, I know this is highly unlikely to happen, and that cyberbullying will keep occuring.  Just know that you are never truly anonymous, even online.  There are always ways to track someone down and find them.  While you may think you are being funny with online bullying, and may even feel it’s not “real” because it’s online, the victim will probably feel differently.  Don’t be surprised if you engage in cyberbullying and your victim tracks you down and beats your face in, rather than hurting themselves.



Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Media Ethics: Journalism and Social Networking

Watch this guys! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op9vugimuko&feature=related
I know you guys can relate on this. Also, you can learn something on this video. According to , she said "This video analyzes the journalistic ethics of using social networking sites as news sources, as well as the quality of news content. It was created by Lindsay Cooper, Julie Mansmann, Vincent Seibert, and Mika Iwakari for Professor Good's Fall 2009 Media Ethics class at SUNY New Paltz."

Monday, December 5, 2011

7-month-old fetus found floating in Quezon City creek


MANILA, Philippines—A seven-month-old fetus was found floating in a creek in Quezon City early Monday, police said.
According to Senior Police Officer 1 Cherry Sanchez of the QC Police District, the fetus was found floating in a creek along Visayas Avenue, Barangay (village) Vasra, QC around 8 a.m.
The police, according to Senior Police Officer 1 Cherry Sanchez of the QC Police District, was conducting an investigation to possibly locate the person who dumped the fetus, which was found in a creek on Visayas Avenue, Barangay (village) Vasra, around 8 a.m.
Sanchez said that the remains of the fetus is now with St. Raphael Funeral Homes.
She said that if nobody claims the fetus, the funeral home might just bury it.—Jamie Marie Elona

REAL AND ETHICAL JOURNALIST

Genalli Francisco
What is a journalist? A journalist is a person whose job is to collect news and write about it for newspapers, magazines, television or radio. To basically define the article of Maria Ressa, “we are journalists first,” it means the main role of a journalist is to write.
Upon reading the article, I have pointed out three sentences that stood out for me and those three made the article more concrete.
The first one was – “Treat the story as if we aren’t ABS-CBN because we are journalists first.” The word “bias” does not exist in their vocabularies. And that is what a REAL and ETHICAL journalist must possess. Freedom is so much a part of the human makeup. We are made to have freedom of association, of expression, and of movement. And in so doing, we have the right to choose whether we will be stuck within the perception that in every article we make, we live under the name of our bosses and the company, or we will be as free as a bird to write whatever we want to write.
The second statement was – “Our interest is to get to the truth because we are responsible to the people.” As what President Noynoy Aquino has said, “kayo ang boss ko.” It also applies to a REAL and ETHICAL journalist. They owe the truth to the people not to their boss nor the company. The people deserve the truth for they are the ones to judge if you’re a credible journalist or not.
The last statement that caught my attention was – “if we do our jobs well, all Filipinos will benefit because we will help build a better nation with more transparent processes.” Building a better nation with the help of truth in writing will benefit not only the Filipinos at present, but also, the nest generation.
The main role of a journalist is to write. And in so doing, he or she must ne responsible and must be prepared to justify his or her actions.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Mass Media Democracy: Freedom has its limitations

by April Joy Apilado 
 
  Here in the Philippines, the government type is democracy so it just follows that mass media is all about freedom of expression and speech. But a lot of media practitioners do not know how to handle such freedom and it results to negative results. First, democracy is defined by the Merriam Webster Dictionary as a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections and mass media is defined as a medium of communication (as newspapers, radio, or television) that is designed to reach the mass of the people. 

           Freedom is often mistaken that a person can do anything he wants, but in reality if a person does that, it would often lead to other person’s demise. Freedom comes with a responsibility, that when a person does something, he should know his limits and the consequences of his actions. Freedom of expression does not give you the power to destroy another person’s life or reputation; it gives the person the power to reach out to a lot of people, in the world of mass media that is.

          Mass media must not be used to a person’s personal gain, it should not be used incorrectly and most of all it must not be used in an abusive way. Being a media practitioner is a great opportunity to start change in the society but it can also bring doom to the society. It means that a practitioner must know his/her limits in giving out information to the society. For example, there is a hostage taking in a house, the police are trying to negotiate with the suspect. It came down to the decision that the SWAT Team will take down the suspect. The media reported the said plan to the news and was televised. The suspect is watching the news for information about his demands and it lead to him knowing the police’s plans. You may know the outcome and it certainly will end up in a couple of dead bodies.

        That is what I am talking about with the said limitations of media practitioners. Certain information must not be televised or broadcasted because it may cause negative outcomes and may endanger a person’s life.


Saturday, December 3, 2011

mo twister's breakdown

is this ethical?bashing someone in the internet where it can be seen by millions of people

AQUINO_COJUANGCO: FACTS THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW

ito ung video na nabanggit ko kanina nung nadaan ng discussion ung about sa hacienda luisita. :)
tulad nga nang sinabi ni Kris, mahahalata mo sa video na may gustong palabasin pero syempre na sa sa inyo na un kung ano ang gusto niyong isipin.. :))



*aha! marunong na akong mag-link salamat sa video tutorial ni ma'am.. :))
**CTTO po. :)